1. In-house Employee

• Typical Approach: Promise of control—like holding the brush for your masterpiece: Hiring an in-house employee might seem tempting due to the promise of direct control.

• Reality: One shade, one tone. Also, add the concealed costs of CPP, EI, extras, and oh my, those vacation days.

• Risk & Cost:
  Medium Cost:
  entry level salary + added costs (tango with entry salaries + encore costs)
  
  High Risk:
  Generic content, lack of experience; (rookie moves alert)

• Our Advantage: Think a seasoned artist, but at a fresher's fee. Pure expertise, sans the unexpected solos. We offer senior-level quality at a starting-level price tag, with no hidden costs. Get the expertise without the extra financial burden.

cost

risk

2. In-house Team

• Typical Approach: An ensemble, harmonizing every skill set.

• Reality: The crescendo of costs with varying expertise— and sometimes, an outsider’s note. The costs quickly pile up between senior, intermediate, and entry-level salaries, not to mention additional employment costs and occasional outsourcing.

• Risk & Cost:
  Very High Cost:
  Senior level salaries and additional costs (multiple maestros + diverse encore costs)
  
  Low Risk:
  Adequate talent pool and experience

• Our Advantage: Think a seasoned artist, but at a fresher's fee. Pure expertise, sans the unexpected solos: Our comprehensive solution eliminates the need to juggle multiple team members or outsource additional services.
  

cost

risk

3. Project Based Approach

• Typical Approach: Piecemeal projects, each a separate serenade: Contracting projects out as they come.

• Reality: The crescendo of costs with varying expertise: Inconsistent quality, unforeseen expenses, and overlooked aspects of a campaign.

• Risk & Cost:
  High Cost:
  High per-project price tags + unpredictable overall cost
  
  High Risk:
  High risk of inconsistency and generic productions
  

• Our Advantage: Our consistent rhythm at a set rate. Always pitch-perfect, never off-beat: top-notch quality that doesn’t skip details.
  

cost

risk

4. Freelancer

• Typical Approach: Low-cost, wide array. The siren song of budget branding. Offering a lower cost in exchange for a breadth of services.

• Reality: Sometimes it’s more cacophony than symphony. Quality can often be compromised, resulting in generic content that dilutes brand uniqueness.

• Risk & Cost:
  Low Cost
  
  High Risk:
  Dance on the edge (generic, inconsistent output)

• Our Advantage: Big band sound, garage band prices. Never dance to just any tune. We deliver big agency quality at small agency prices. Don't settle for mediocrity.
  

cost

risk

5. Big Agency

• Typical Approach: Grammy-worthy portfolios with matching ticket prices. Impressive portfolios with a price tag to match.

• Reality: Unless you're their Beyoncé, you might just be their opening act.

• Risk & Cost:
  Very High Cost:
  Skyrocket Serenade
  
  Low Risk:
  Great craftsmanship

• Our Advantage: In our studio, every brand is a headliner. Encore-worthy work without the celebrity invoice. With us, you’re always a priority.
  

cost

risk

6. Tech-Focused Digital Agency

• Typical Approach: All about the techno beat, sometimes missing the song. Prioritizing tech and code above all.

• Reality: A seamless backend, but where’s the heart and soul?While the back-end may function seamlessly, the human-centric aesthetic and direction can be lacking.

• Risk & Cost:
  Medium Cost:
  To begin with. Could grow as you go
  
  High Risk:
  Highly generic output, newbie creativity

• Our Advantage: We fuse Mozart with modern tech. Your brand gets an ovation. We merge technical proficiency with a compelling art direction so your brand gets the best of both worlds.
  

cost

risk

In the concert of brands, don’t let your voice get drowned in the chorus. Our compositions? Customized. Beyond mere tunes, we craft stories. While others hum a bar, we orchestrate operas, finely tuned to your brand's vibe.

Join our ensemble, and let’s craft your brand's magnum opus.